Kari Mullis – inventor of PCR test (used to create the Pandemic magnitude we are in)
Nobel Prize in Chemistry – 1993
Kari Mullis said PCR test WAS NOT designed to test for a virus
It has been documented that the number of deaths
from mitigation for CoVID-19
has now significantly exceeded that from CoVID-19 itself.
This is attributed to increased rates of
depression, suicide, drug overdoses, etc.
CoVID-19 Testing PCR – A Critical Appraisal (Excellent review of PCR testing & Covid)
He (Kari Mullis) warned against this technique ever being used for diagnosis due to the complexity of the process and because of a relatively high rate of false positive results if performed on asymptomatic individuals, as well as with false negative results. He pointed out, among other things, that PCR required selecting a particular number of “amplifications” or multiplications of the original tiny string of genetic material (DNA), and that the cutoff between “positive” and “negative” was arbitrary and could vary from place to place or over time.
Kari Mullis – inventor of PCR test –
Awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993 for this discovery
PCR Test is used to diagnose all these “cases” that created the Pandemic we are in. PCR testing provided the huge numbers of people with diagnosed with Covid that allow the people guiding the pandemic in the U.S. and many other countries to shut down the economy
Kari Mullis said PCR test WAS NOT designed to test for a virus
“PCR test is quantitative and tells us what’s there. Results can be misrepresented. It allows you take a miniscule amount of anything, make it measurable and say it’s there like its important. If you look incorrectly at the PCR test by over “amplifying”, one can find almost anything – even 1 molecule.”
PCR Testing recently added 7-21-2021:
“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
In Feb 2020 (beginning of Covid Pandemic) CDC used this PCR test to diagnose Covid.
The PCR test was used by (CDC, NIH, FDA) to create the illusion that Covid was so prevalent and deadly that we needed to mask, social distance, disrupt the entire economy, keep kids fearful and out or schools, much less playing in school.
With the pressure from many, the CDC finally admits that the PCR test used, can NOT distinguish between Influenza and Covid. It seems, influenza cases nearly disappeared in 2020 as influenza was re-labeled “covid” due to the faulty testing.
REALIZE this PCR test was used to
A) Create this massive fear
B) Mandate everyone including kids wear masks
C) Mandate social distancing so we couldn’t communicate easily
D) Mandate people from working, paying bills, and destroying the economy
E) Mandate we all needed to be vaccinated to overcome the pandemic
F) Help destroy friendships and relationships and alienate us from each other if we had a different opinion
I do not feel good about anyone who has had severe Covid complications or died.
There is and always has been SUCCESSFUL treatment (see CENSORSHIP)
Mike Adams (health and nutrition researcher) – reviews with references this recent turn of events:
“CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel .”
The FDA document admits: Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
In other words, they had no covid virus from which to develop and calibrate the test, so they mixed up a cocktail of human cells and RNA fragments from a common cold virus, then called it “covid.” The GenBank sequence referred to in this paragraph is simply a digital library definition that’s labeled “covid” but has no supporting reference materials in physical reality either.
That’s because no doctor or researcher has isolated “covid” from any infected, symptomatic patient. As a result, no laboratory instruments can be calibrated against actual covid, and the tests simply rely on digital libraries pushed out by the CDC and WHO, using “covid” as the label.
The PCR tests are then instructed to look for these genetic sequences obtained from the fabricated digital libraries, meaning the entire scheme is junk science circular logic with no basis in physical reality.
(For more see article referenced above by Mike Adams)
Kary Mullis vs Dr. Fauci
KM – “If you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody”. What he is saying is if PCR test is amplified HIGH ENOUGH as they artificially did in Covid pandemic it led to many people being diagnosed – FALSE POSITIVES. These people were asymptomatic BECAUSE they didn’t have Covid 19. They did it this time as they got away with it before.
30 years ago Fauci, (head of NIH) made a name for himself by pushing higher doses of AZT (being prescribed as treatment for AIDS). Kari Bullis was higher to measure HIV in people’s blood samples using PCR. He was working on the premise that HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. He found that it didn’t exist and Fauci and NIH just made it up.
In an interview with Celia Farber for SPIN Magazine he said ” Heres a Nobel Prize – winner trying to ask simple question from those who spent $22 BILLION and killed 100,000 people.” Dr. Mullis said that his PCR test doesn’t tell you that you are sick. It just finds fragments of viruses, pieces of RNA or DNA. The test is not designed to find an actual intact virus.
Covid case counts and death counts are inflated because they come from a test called PCR
Dr. Mullis died on August 7, 2019, but he was angry about how his test was being misused even before Covid. For example, when Tony Fauci was using Dr. Mullis’ PCR to test for HIV, Dr. Mullis was very outspoken and even called Fauci a liar.
Dr. Mullis said, “[Tony Fauci] does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.” Dr. Mullis said that his PCR test doesn’t tell you that you are sick. It just finds fragments of viruses, pieces of RNA or DNA. The test is not designed to find an actual intact virus.
Mullis said: “With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody…[PCR] allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings as if it is important…[PCR] doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you.”
Even, Tony Fauci told us, perhaps accidentally, that the tests are inaccurate. PCR uses cycles to amplify something very small so it can be detected. But, too many cycles and the test is inaccurate. So, the more cycles PCR uses the more inaccurate it becomes. For Covid-19, Fauci said anything more than 35 cycles is inaccurate.
Fauci said: “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36… you got to say it’s just dead nucleotides, period.” But, the FDA, which authorizes the PCR test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.
The FDA states: “When all controls exhibit the expected performance, a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct). The RNase P may or may not be positive as described above, but the 2019-nCoV result is still valid.”
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only
See pdf page 37. This document is marked, “Effective: 12/01/2020.”