Dr. Peter McCullough MD–
(Internist, Cardiologist, Epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas, editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, editor of Cardio-Renal Medicine, Senior Associate Editor of American Journal of Cardiology (the most venerated journal in our entire field). President of the cardio-Renal Society, most published person in Heart – Kidney Disease connections in the world. He also has a master’s degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States and is the editor of two medical journals. He has published the 2 major Covid-19 treatment papers, and led the early treatment initiative in the US. He is the senior associate editor for the American Journal of Cardiology. That’s the most venerated journal in our entire field.
In December 2020, McCullough published an updated protocol, co-written with 56 other authors who also had extensive experience with treating COVID-19 outpatients. The article, “Multifaceted Highly Targeted Sequential Multidrug Treatment of Early Ambulatory High-Risk SARS-CoV-2 Infection,”3 was published in the journal Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, of which McCullough is the editor-in-chief. “That paper, today … is the most frequently downloaded paper from Journal,”McCullough says. “It also is the basis for the American Association of Physician and Surgeons COVID early treatment guide.
Dr. McCullough is in Texas where they never underwent lockdown. he was among 35 treating doctors who were willing to go giants their medical centers and treat patients. These doctors convinced their governor to initiate an executive order to recognize natural immunity and banning any mandatory vaccines by any public agency, banning vaccine passports.
We were on schedule to have 1.7 to 2.1 million fatalities in US,
as estimated by the CDC and others. We cut it off at about 600,000.
That still is a tragedy.
I’ve testified that 85% of that 600,000 could have been saved
if we would have had … the protocols in place from the start.
Prestigious medical journals like The Lancet were even caught colluding with the drug industry, publishing a completely fabricated study on HCQ, showing it was dangerous. The Lancet let that hang up there for two weeks, scaring the entire world against hydroxychloroquine — which turns out to be one of the safest and most effective widely utilized in people with COVID-19. And when they took it down, it was unapologetic. My interpretation of this is that was very intentional.
What happened with ivermectin’s use in the ICU was also very intentional and a collusion … Dr. J.J Rashtak had used it in hundreds and hundreds of patients in Florida and published in CHEST, one of the best pulmonary journals, that ivermectin reduced mortality.
Yet to this day, hospitals across the United States flat out refuse to use ivermectin. Desperate patients and families have to get court orders to order these doctors to use ivermectin. So, there’s a mass mentality of almost intentionally harming patients. There’s absolutely no grounds for doctors and administrators … to deny patients ivermectin. There is a global collusion, specifically in U.S. hospitals, to cause as much harm and death as conceivable. It’s beyond belief
McCullough believes the end goal
was to secure the rollout of a
mass vaccination campaign.
“Propaganda is the dissemination of false or misleading information
by people of authority in a collusional manner.
And that’s exactly what’s going on.
We have a propagandized campaign for mass vaccination.
There’s no doubt about it. It’s actually very overt …
And believe me, there are hundreds of millions of people
under the propagandized spell that the COVID-19 vaccine
is going to deliver us from this crisis.”
Mercola notes Very clearly, there’s massive collusion to suppress the truth about these gene therapies as well. Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, recently spoke out about his concerns, and not only did YouTube ban the interview, but Wikipedia also erased his name from the historical section of the mRNA vaccine.
Why Were Standardized Safety Protocols Omitted?
As for the motivation or reason for ignoring virtually all standardized safety measures, McCullough says: “There has been such a suppression of early treatment … and a complete propagandized campaign for social distancing, wearing masks, promoting fear, suffering, hospitalization and death. And to prepare the population for mass vaccination, the last thing they wanted to do is have anything that could potentially restrict the population that would be taking the vaccine.
When those billboards went up in every city in US,
the stakeholders — which are the CDC, the NIH, the FDA, and then Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson outside the United States, and AstraZeneca —
they meant business.
The Spike Protein Is Not a Cure; It’s a Disease Agent
As of June 18, 2021, we have 387,087 adverse event reports filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including 6,113 deaths, a large portion of which occurred within days of injection, and 6,435 life threatening reactions. We also have very good evidence to suggest this is a gross undercount, in part due to general underreporting, and in part due to VAERS refusing to accept reports — particularly those involving deaths — and scrubbing reports that have already been filed. So, these already alarming numbers likely only represent the tip of the iceberg.
“We have red hot problems, like children and
young adults developing myocarditis,
inflammation of the heart.
I just saw such a patient yesterday”.
“These are proven cases.
This is not make believe. This is for real.
These vaccines all trick the body into making the spike protein of the virus. The spike protein itself is pathogenic. It’s actually what makes the virus dangerous. It was the object of gain-of-function research. So, it has a dangerous mechanism of action. Why? Because the spike protein is produced in an uncontrolled fashion. This is an uncontrolled quantity of spike protein. Probably each person is different, so may have [lower] production of it. They have very little symptoms after the vaccine, they’re fine.
There are unfortunate individuals
that must have massive amount of spike protein,
and that spike protein ravages the body
wherever the spike protein is locally made,
and we do know the messenger RNA and the adenoviral DNA
gets distributed in all the organs.
So if messenger RNA is up in the brain and
we start producing spike protein in the brain,
we cause local brain injury.
In the heart, it causes myocarditis and cardiac injury.
In the liver, it causes liver injury, in the lung, lung injury,
in the kidney, kidney injury.
The spike protein damages endothelial cells and
causes blood clotting. So, blood clotting, the dreaded complication
of the infection itself, is now caused by the vaccine.
DNA Changes, Cancer and Chronic Illness Are Possible Effects
McCullough also discusses the risk that these mRNA injections might become permanently incorporated into your DNA by way of reverse transcriptase. “There now have been enough studies to suggest there is some reverse transcription — that in fact the RNA creates DNA and then DNA gets permanently put into the human genome,” he explains. “We know this from the natural infection. The T-Detect test actually checks the T-cells when it tracks the DNA. This is a commercial test you can get if you had COVID-19, and it looks for minor chromosomal re-arrangements that code for cell surface receptors on T-cells.”
Mercola adds – Long Term Risks Are Unknown
Before COVID came along, the FDA required vaccine makers to provide 24 months’ worth of data before they’d allow it. This was truncated down to two months for the COVID shots. So, anyone who says the shots are safe long term is lying because no such data exists to prove this. “The consent form says, ‘We don’t know if this is going to work, we don’t know if it’s going to last, and we don’t know if it’s going to be safe.’ They say that. So, anybody who takes the vaccine is going to have to think about this and understand that we don’t know anything beyond two months.
Impossible for Vaccination Program to Improve Disease Curve
The COVID injection trials conflated absolute and relative risk. Pfizer claimed its mRNA shot was 95% effective, but that was the relative risk reduction — the absolute risk reduction was actually less than 1%.6 As noted by McCullough, healthy adults under 50, teens and children have a less than 1% chance of hospitalization and death from COVID-19, so they don’t have a medical need for it.
COVID Shot May Raise Your Risk of COVID Death
What’s worse, McCullough cites data showing that those who have gotten the shot and end up with COVID-19 anyway have far higher rates of hospitalization and death. “The CDC was so overwhelmed [with adverse reports], they gave up. God knows how many tens or hundreds of thousands of Americans got vaccinated and got COVID-19 anyway. It looks just like regular COVID. In the data they had, it was a 9% risk of hospitalization and then a 3% risk of death.”
What this means is that, by taking the injection,
you trade in a 0.26%7 risk of death,
should you contract COVID-19,
for a 3% risk of death if you get infected.
If you’re younger than 40,
you’re trading a 0.01%8 risk of death for a 3% risk.
WHAT WE NEED TO DO
We need to stop taking these COVID shots. Beyond that, we’ll need to experiment to determine the best ways to block the damage done by the spike protein, for however long that is produced and stays in circulation.
“If there’s any mother who’s concerned about their child developing myocarditis, the way to avoid it is just don’t bring your child to a vaccination center,” McCullough says.
“Everyone is just going to have to learn to say no. We cannot be harmed by the vaccine if we just decline it. And the vaccine is completely elective. The CDC, the NIH, FDA, they’ve all said it’s elective. You don’t have to take it. Those agencies, by the way, they’re not taking it.
So, nobody has to take it. And everyone who is in a school or a university, or a workplace where they’re saying you have to take it, or say you have to take it for travel, the answer is no you don’t. You do not have to take it for travel. And yes, you can show up to work without the vaccine. And yes, you can show up to school without the vaccine.
[The COVID vaccination campaign]
will go down in history
as the biggest medical biological product
safety catastrophe in human history, by far.
There’s nothing close …
You can imagine how many heads
are going to roll when this thing
ultimately comes to its finality.
~ Dr. Peter McCullough