Dr. Michael Yeadon – Former V.P. of Pfizer

Dr. Michael Yeadon – Former V.P. of Pfizer and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer
Senior Chief Scientific Officer, Allergy and Respiratory Research,
Pfizer R&D (1995-2011)
Allergy and Respiratory Head, Pfizer Global R&D (2005-2008)
CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Head, Pfizer Global R&D (2006-2011)
Degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based Ph.D. in respiratory pharmacology. He’s spent 32 years of his career working for large pharmaceutical companies, and 10 years in the biotechnology sector.

Dr. Yeadon fears the combination of
vaccine passports and booster vaccines
against SARS-CoV-2 variants
may be part of a mass depopulation agenda

BREAKING NEWS (2 stories) :
Project Veritas interviews Pfizer whistleblower shares deep secret emails
of several Pfizer Sr VP of research /  marketing etc.

scientist caught on camera saying insider information
not aware he was being filmed

Asymptomatic spread is a fallacy
capitalized upon to spread fear

and induce compliance.
Only people who have discernible symptoms
of a respiratory infection pose any health risk
to others, because to be an efficient source
of infection, you need a high viral load.
If you have a high viral load,
your immune system will fight back,
which always induces symptoms
LB – he’s saying if one is significantly affected
they will be sick with symptoms

The myth of asymptomatic spread was used to justify lockdowns,
which in turn were a tool get you used to giving up your freedoms
and go along with the intentional decimation of the global economy
and old way of life, thereby justifying the Great Reset.
The Great Reset is about transferring global wealth and
ownership rights to the technocratic elite, and
giving them the power to control the world’s nations

Digital vaccine passports will form the foundation
of an unprecedented surveillance and control platform
into which your entire life will be tied,
from health records to biometric ID,
to an all-digital centralized banking system and
a social credit system, all of which can be turned off
in order to coerce you into a particular behavior

In this interview, (Done by Dr. Mercola DO) – which is part of the full-length documentaryPlanet Lockdown,”1Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a life science researcher and former vice-president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer, shares his views on the COVID-19 pandemic, fast-tracked COVID-19 “vaccines, the issue of mutated virus variants and the need for booster shots, and how this manufactured crisis is being used to strip us of our civil liberties.

I’m in favor of all modes of new medical treatments, whether they’re biologicals or vaccines….but I’m fervently against unsafe medicines or medicines used in an inappropriate context,” Yeadon says.

“Some of the things I’m going to say are not favorable to the current crop of gene-based vaccines and it’s [because] they’re being inappropriately used. I don’t think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a sort of wide-spectrum public health prophylactic …

“To be a good, efficient source of infection, you have to have a lot of virus. And if you have a lot of viruses attacking you, you are fighting back. That process produces symptoms, inevitably, not just occasionally. It must always happen …  
And those people are not people who are walking around in the community, because if you’re full of virus and symptomatic, you are also ill, and ill people tend to stay at home or in bed.”

“Basically, everything your government has told you about this virus, everything you need to do to stay safe, is a lie,”
Yeadon says. “Every part of it … None of the key themes that you hear talked about — from asymptomatic transmission to top-up vaccines [i.e., booster shots] — not one of those things is supported by the science. 
Every piece is cleverly chosen adjacently to something that probably is true, but is itself a lie, and has led people to where we are right now. I don’t normally use phrases like this, but I think we are standing at the very gates of hell … It’s all about control … The reason I’m commenting is because I believe it’s not just about my life. More importantly, [it’s the lives] of my children and grandchildren that are being stolen … by a systematic process of fear and control that’s going to culminate in, I think, some very horrible times, and I’m desperate to wake you up …

The entire vaccination campaign is built around the premise that by injecting a synthetic piece of viral RNA into your cells, your body will start producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in response to which your body will produce specific antibodies that recognize that protein. This is also known as humoral immunity.

Immunity against viruses, actually does not depend on antibodies (opposed to bacteria). We have a defect and they actually don’t make antibodies, but they’re able to fight off COVID-19, the virus SARS-CoV-2, quite well. The way they do that is, they have T-cell immunity, cellular immunity. [T-cells] are cells that are trained to detect virus-infected cells and to kill those cells. That’s how you defend yourself against a virus. So, all of these mentions of antibody levels, it’s just bunk.

Antibodies Are Not the Answer to Variants
The central role of T-cell immunity, or cellular immunity, becomes particularly pertinent when discussing the threat of variants, mutated forms of SARS-CoV-2. Parasites, fungi, bacteria and viruses are the main threat categories. Each of these invades and threatens you in completely different ways, and your immune system has ways of dealing with all of them, using a variety of mechanisms. “You’ve got four or five different arms of the immune system: innate immunity, mucosal, antibody, T-cells and compliment[ary systems],” Yeadon says. What I’m telling you is that the emphasis on antibodies in respect of respiratory viral infections is wrong, and you can establish that quite easily by doing some searching.”

Mercola clarifies: Yeadon is saying is that whether you’re going to be susceptible to variants has very little to do with whether or not you have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, because antibodies are not your primary defense against viruses. Your T-cells are the ones doing the heavy lifting.

Getting booster shots for different variants
is NOT going to help you.
It will not solve the problem,
because these shots do not strengthen
your T-cell immunity.

It’s really important to know
that if you find the variant that’s most different
from the sequence identified in Wuhan,
that variance … is only 0.3% different
from the original sequence.

(99.7% identical to the original one,
and I can assure you … that amount of difference
is absolutely NOT possibly able to represent itself
to you as a different virus.”)

He explains how, earlier in the pandemic, scientists obtained blood from patients who had been sickened with the SARS virus 17 or 18 years ago. SARS-CoV-1, responsible for that SARS outbreak, is 80% similar to SARS-CoV-2.

They wanted to know if the immune systems of these patients would be able to recognize SARS-CoV-2. They did. They still had memory T-cells against SARS-CoV-1, and those cells also recognized SARS-CoV-2, despite being only 80% similar.

Now, if a 20% difference was not enough
to circumvent the immune system of these patients,
why should you be concerned with a variant
that is at most 0.3% different from the original SARS-CoV-2?

Yeadon says.
We know that the people [SARS-CoV-2] injures and kills
are only people who are elderly and or ill, usually both,
so we’re talking about less than 0.1% [of the population] …
Given that this virus represents, at worst,
a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than influenza,
and a smaller risk [than influenza] to almost everyone else …
it was never necessary for us to have done anything.
We didn’t need to do anything.
[We didn’t need] lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines.

There are multiple therapeutic drugs
that are at least as effective as the vaccines are.

They’re already available and cheap. Inhaled corticosteroids
that are used in asthma reduced symptomatology by about 90%.

An off-patent drug called Ivermectin, one of the most widely-used drugs in the world,
is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease,
including lethality by about 90%.

I believe they’re going to be used
to damage your health and possibly kill you.
Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation
other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation.

This will provide the tools to do it, and plausible deniability.
They’ll create another story about some sort of biological threat
and you’ll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and
a few months or a year or so later,
you’ll die of some peculiar inexplicable syndrome.
And they won’t be able to associate it with the vaccines.

Key Safety Concerns of mRNA ‘Vaccines’

In December 2020, Yeadon filed a petition2 calling on the European Medicine Agency to halt Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine until they’ve been restructured to address critical safety concerns. Of course, those trials were not halted. The four key safety concerns Yeadon specified in his petition3 were:

1. The potential for formation of non-neutralizing antibodies that can trigger an exaggerated immune reaction (referred to as paradoxical immune enhancement or antibody-dependent immune amplification) when the individual is exposed to the real “wild” virus post-vaccination.

Antibody-dependent amplification has been repeatedly demonstrated in coronavirus vaccine trials on animals.4 While the animals initially tolerated the vaccine well and had robust immune responses, they later became severely ill or died when infected with the wild virus. Put plainly, the vaccine increased their susceptibility to the virus and made them more likely to die from the infection.

(LB – 3 different studies had similar results – last being Fauci’s ferrets all died in 2-2004)

2. Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), and studies have shown 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance. This suggests PEG may trigger fatal allergic reactions in many who receive the vaccine.

Indeed, within days of the vaccine’s release, reports started coming in of people having life-threatening anaphylactic reactions, leading to warnings that people with known allergies should not take the Pfizer vaccine. Since then, anaphylactic reactions have been reported by recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine as well.
(See VAERS reports)

3. The mRNA vaccine triggers your body to produce antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a woman’s immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is the possibility she could become infertile.

This is an issue that none of the vaccine studies is looking at specifically. Mass vaccinating women of childbearing age against COVID-19 could potentially have the devastating consequence of causing mass infertility if the vaccine triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1.


4. The studies are far too brief in duration to allow a realistic estimation of side effects. Depending on what those effects end up being, millions of people may be exposed to unacceptable risk in return for a very minor benefit.

I’m absolutely terrified that the combination
of vaccine passports and top-up vaccines
is going to lead to mass depopulation,
deliberate execution, potentially of billions of people.
~ Michael Yeadon, Ph.D.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP at Pfizer, wrote a 43 page paper with a fellow doctor and explained in detail why the PCR tests are in his words “useless.” – Those reasons included: lack of controls, lack of validation, no standard operating procedure, and significant conflicts of interest including the fact that one or more of the people who designed the PCR test for Covid actually sells the test kits.

Dr. Yeadon said: “In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.”



  • All of this means that the thousands of Covid testing labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are participating in a fraud.
  • It means that millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result.
  • The test is finding “dead nucleotides”, not infectious virus.
  • And that means that the total number of COVID cases and deaths in America is wrong.